Re: [GSoC 2013] [Debian]

From: Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>
To: pgsql-students(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GSoC 2013] [Debian]
Date: 2013-05-01 21:50:59
Message-ID: 51818E43.1000701@fuzzy.cz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-students

On 29.4.2013 10:14, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Aditya Bhardwaj 2013-04-29 <CANr_U0JqvoqMp9viN3EbwKXEeZfm_x6h=_xdNcJth-HaXy0xNQ(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
>> I am Aditya Bhardwaj and I am pursuing the project idea 'Enhancing Debian
>> Blends web sentinel' for GSoC from Debian.
>>
>> Here, it is required that UDD (Ultimate Debian Database) shall produce some
>> appropriate JSON output which can be used to generate data for the Blends
>> web sentinel.
>>
>> And I need some clarification if PostgreSQL can be used for the purpose.
>> And any headers for the same if it can be used. AFAIK PostgreSQL 9.3 shall
>> arrive with a lot of JSON goodness.
>
> To be useful for Debian, it should probably run on PostgreSQL 9.1
> (shipped with Wheezy), or 9.2. I don't think the UDD people would want
> to rely on 9.3 features.

They're running on 9.2 AFAIK

-- see http://wiki.debian.org/UltimateDebianDatabase/Hacking

I'm not sure about the 9.3 though. Maybe they'd be fine with
implementing the features on 9.3 and deploy them once 9.3 gets out.

We can't really answer this as we don't know enough details to decide if
the 9.3 JSON support is sufficient, and the UDD people are the only ones
who can decide if 9.3 is acceptable.

So just like Christoph, I think you should talk to the UDD people about
this first.

Tomas

In response to

Browse pgsql-students by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2013-05-01 22:04:27 Re: : Fuzzy C means algorithms in MAdlib
Previous Message Thom Brown 2013-05-01 08:30:25 Re: GSoC proposals deadline