From: | 张中 <zhangzhong(at)taobao(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | 答复: [HACKERS] is isolation level 'Serializable' in pg not same as 'serializable' in SQL-92? |
Date: | 2009-11-30 23:10:25 |
Message-ID: | 518176FE2AFE8D49BF092A5140BD8D303AE573854D@CNHZ-EXCMS-03.ali.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thank you very much!
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Robert Haas [mailto:robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com]
发送时间: 2009年12月1日 1:37
收件人: 张中
抄送: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
主题: Re: [HACKERS] is isolation level 'Serializable' in pg not same as 'serializable' in SQL-92?
2009/11/30 张茂森 <maosen(dot)zhang(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>:
>
pgsql-hackers is not the right place for user questions; try
pgsql-general or pgsql-novice.
The answer to your question is in the documentation. You can find it here:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/transaction-iso.html#MVCC-SERIALIZABILITY
...Robert
This email (including any attachments) is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you received this email in error, please delete it immediately and do not copy it or use it for any purpose or disclose its contents to any other person. Thank you.
本电邮(包括任何附件)可能含有机密资料并受法律保护。如您不是正确的收件人,请您立即删除本邮件。请不要将本电邮进行复制并用作任何其他用途、或透露本邮件之内容。谢谢。
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-11-30 23:28:21 | Re: Block-level CRC checks |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-11-30 22:06:12 | Re: Application name patch - v4 |