Re: OK to put temp tablespace on volatile storage or to omit it from backups?

From: Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net>
To: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: OK to put temp tablespace on volatile storage or to omit it from backups?
Date: 2013-05-01 06:21:26
Message-ID: 5180B466.6030307@darrenduncan.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

You know what I think Postgres needs? Its an official way to declare a
tablespace in a special way that marks the whole tablespace as being
temporary/volatile, so that whenever the server starts/recovers, it assumes this
tablespace doesn't exist or may not exist and can reinitialize it without
trouble. There would also be restrictions then, that certain things may not be
declared in such a tablespace, such as anything but temporary tables, or maybe
some other things. There is such a reasonable use case for this. A feature for
9.4 perhaps? -- Darren Duncan

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yang Zhang 2013-05-01 06:34:54 Re: OK to put temp tablespace on volatile storage or to omit it from backups?
Previous Message Yang Zhang 2013-05-01 06:14:23 Re: OK to put temp tablespace on volatile storage or to omit it from backups?