From: | Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: OK to put temp tablespace on volatile storage or to omit it from backups? |
Date: | 2013-05-01 03:00:53 |
Message-ID: | 51808565.8070806@darrenduncan.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 2013.04.30 7:14 PM, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote:
> 2013/5/1 Yang Zhang <yanghatespam(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net> wrote:
>>> On 2013.04.30 4:55 PM, Yang Zhang wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I would intuit that it's fine, but I just want to make sure there are
>>>> no gotchas from a recovery point of view:
>>>>
>>>> If I were to lose my temp tablespace upon system crash, would this
>>>> prevent proper crash recovery?
>>>>
>>>> Also, if I were to omit the temp tablespace from the base backup,
>>>> would that prevent proper backup recovery?
>>>
>>>
>>> Although it would be nice if what you said would work, I read in a recent
>>> blog post that losing any tablespace would prevent the database server from
>>> starting, even if it was only for temporary things. -- Darren Duncan
>>
>> That is unfortunate. Good thing I asked, I guess. Do you have a
>> pointer to said blog post?
>
> I think this is the post in question:
>
> http://thebuild.com/blog/2013/03/10/you-cannot-recover-from-the-loss-of-a-tablespace/
Yes, that looks like it. -- Darren Duncan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-05-01 03:13:29 | Re: OK to put temp tablespace on volatile storage or to omit it from backups? |
Previous Message | mattk | 2013-05-01 02:46:54 | Re: Unformatted view DDL in pg_dump |