| From: | Ireneusz Pluta <ipluta(at)wp(dot)pl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | sunil virmani <sunhcl(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: - why only 9.1? |
| Date: | 2013-04-22 08:26:08 |
| Message-ID: | 5174F420.7070002@wp.pl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
W dniu 2013-04-21 19:28, Scott Marlowe pisze:
>> My DB version is little old - 8.1.18.
> Well upgrade as soon as possible. 9.1 is pretty darn stable.
Scott,
excuse me this somewhat off-topic question.
Good to hear that 9.1 is so stable, because this is what I currently use in production. But why I
still use it, is only because I failed to manage my task to migrate to 9.2, so far. Anyway, this
task in on my long-term agenda.
So, let me understand why, as you recommend the OP upgrading, you only mention the 9.1, while there
have already been a few releases of 9.2. Isn't 9.2 stable enough?
Best regards
Irek.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | pradeep singh | 2013-04-22 11:31:13 | template1 vacuuming consuming much time compared to another production DBs |
| Previous Message | Evgeny Shishkin | 2013-04-21 21:33:09 | Re: Issues with OSX and SHMMAX? |