From: | Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> |
---|---|
To: | Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 9.3 Beta 1 Coming Soon! |
Date: | 2013-04-16 21:48:37 |
Message-ID: | 516DC735.3030908@proxel.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 04/16/2013 02:46 AM, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote:
> OTOH, it is kind of nifty when working with SRFs; once I got my head around it
> I realized it was a feature I've been missing pretty much since SRFs
> first appeared.
>
> Do you use set-returning functions a lot?
> Do you get frustrated by the error message "function expression in
> FROM cannot refer to other relations of same query level" and find
> yourself wondering if there's an easier way of integrating SRFs
> directly into FROM clauses?
> Then PostgreSQL 9.3's all-new LATERAL keyword is your new bestest
> friend and will revolutionize your life (for certain values of
> revolution)!
Tom fixed so LATERAL is implicit for set retuning functions so the
LATERAL keyword is now only required for subqueries.
To me personally the addition of LATERAL might be the most important new
feature in 9.3 (together with the FK locks), and something I have wished
for a long time. But I do understand it might be hard to explain and use
in marketing.
--
Andreas Karlsson
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gavin Flower | 2013-04-17 01:19:54 | Re: 9.3 Beta 1 Coming Soon! |
Previous Message | Andreas Karlsson | 2013-04-16 21:38:13 | Re: 9.3 Beta 1 Coming Soon! |