| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com>, damien clochard <damien(at)dalibo(dot)info>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jonathan(dot)katz(at)excoventures(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions |
| Date: | 2013-04-09 16:19:06 |
| Message-ID: | 51643F7A.60806@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 04/09/2013 09:01 AM, Michael Meskes wrote:
>> Well no because traditional packagers all release at the same time
>> so that there is no disparity between when Ubuntu gets the fix and
>> Solaris gets the fix.
>
> So what do I misunderstand? As far as I read it, Damien said all should get the
> fix at the same time, right? Which is what you say and also what Dave said,
> isn't it? I think the question we're dancing around here is, should anyone be
> allowed to deploy before the embargo is over? I don't mind DBaaS providers
> getting the fix early, but I mind seeing it deployed early.
Maybe I wasn't clear, sorry. No. I do not believe that ANY entity should
be able to deploy before the embargo is over.
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Michael
>
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC
@cmdpromptinc - 509-416-6579
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Douglas J Hunley | 2013-04-09 16:27:12 | Re: elephant logo in OFM format? |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2013-04-09 16:13:04 | Re: Call for Google Summer of Code mentors, admins |