| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com>, damien clochard <damien(at)dalibo(dot)info>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jonathan(dot)katz(at)excoventures(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions |
| Date: | 2013-04-09 15:39:03 |
| Message-ID: | 51643617.2090104@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 04/09/2013 02:55 AM, Michael Meskes wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 09:21:59AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>> I'm not arguing either way here... but if you think of DBaaS as "the
>> new packaging", it starts to seem more reasonable to give folks like
>> Heroku access at the same time as the traditional packagers.
>
> Good point. Isn't this along the same lines as Damien's posting, in that we
> should not be on the hook for their deployment time?
Well no because traditional packagers all release at the same time so
that there is no disparity between when Ubuntu gets the fix and Solaris
gets the fix.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Michael
>
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC
@cmdpromptinc - 509-416-6579
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Meskes | 2013-04-09 16:01:19 | Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2013-04-09 15:37:53 | Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions |