From: | David Wall <d(dot)wall(at)computer(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Permissions on large objects - db backup and restore |
Date: | 2013-04-04 00:39:48 |
Message-ID: | 515CCBD4.1050004@computer.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 4/3/2013 3:14 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> A 9.2->9.2 dump and restore certainly should preserve large object
> ownership (and permissions, if you've set any). In a quick check I do
> see "ALTER LARGE OBJECT nnn OWNER TO ..." commands in pg_dump's output
> for such a case. Are you sure this is really the "same" issue? Are you
> doing something strange like using pg_dump's --no-owner option? Did
> you get any errors while doing the pg_dump or pg_restore? (Trying to
> run the restore as non-superuser would mean the ALTER OWNER commands
> would fail, but you should have gotten plenty of bleats about that.)
> regards, tom lane
We used this to backup on server1 (9.2.2):
pg_dump --format=c --oids /dbname/
And we restored on server2 (9.2.3) with:
pg_restore -v -O -d /dbname/
The application user/role is the same name as the /dbname /but has more
limited permissions than the superuser/role $PGUSER used when running
pg_dump and pg_restore.
How can I check if ALTER LARGE OBJECT is specified in my backup? Do I
need to change the --format option?
I'm not positive it was the same issue as when I upgraded from 8.4, but
I did note that my db had a different pg_largeobject_metadata.lomowner
value before and after I ran that DO script to alter each and the
problem with reading a large object in my code went away.
Thanks, David
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-04-04 00:57:05 | Re: Permissions on large objects - db backup and restore |
Previous Message | Quentin Hartman | 2013-04-03 23:32:08 | Re: PostgreSQL Backup Booklet |