| From: | Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Postgres upgrade, security release, where? |
| Date: | 2013-04-02 03:43:48 |
| Message-ID: | 515A53F4.7080403@catalyst.net.nz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 02/04/13 13:55, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 09:40:07AM +0900, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote:
>>> Due to the security nature of the release, the source and binaries will
>>> only be publicly available on April 4 --- there are no pre-release
>>> versions available.
>>
>> The PostgreSQL homepage has a big announcement saying
>> "PostgreSQL minor versions released!", including a mention of a
>> "security issue";
>> unfortunately it's not obvious that this is for the prior 9.2.3 release and as
>> the announcement of the upcoming security release
>> ( http://www.postgresql.org/about/news/1454/ ) does not mention the
>> new release number, methinks there is plenty of room for confusion :(
>>
>> It might be an idea to update the "splash box" with details of the upcoming
>> release.
>
> I agree updating the "spash box" would make sense.
>
Or perhaps include a date on said splashes, so we know when to panic :-)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2013-04-02 06:08:12 | Re: Problems with pg_locks explosion |
| Previous Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2013-04-02 03:41:06 | Re: Fwd: Problems with pg_locks explosion |