From: | "Wright, George" <George(dot)Wright(at)infimatic(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Andrej Ricnik-Bay" <andrej(dot)groups(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: function source |
Date: | 2008-07-11 16:59:16 |
Message-ID: | 51548D6D5BEB57468163194A8C1A0E98C6BE62@MAGPTCPEXC02.na.mag-ias.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
For intel. Prop. Reasons, I don't want the source for the functions to
be visible. The functions I've written are plpgsql and if I do \df+
<function> it displays the fully readable entire source.
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrej Ricnik-Bay [mailto:andrej(dot)groups(at)gmail(dot)com]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2008 12:57 PM
To: Wright, George
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [NOVICE] function source
On 12/07/2008, Wright, George <George(dot)Wright(at)infimatic(dot)com> wrote:
> So does that mean there is no way to hide the source for procedural
> language functions in postgresql?
Let's say it's not easy to just "read" the definition ... one can go
and use a disassembler to see what your procedure does if one
feels the urge (and is good with assembler). The question is also:
"whom do you want to stop from seeing them?"
--
Please don't top post, and don't use HTML e-Mail :} Make your quotes
concise.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrej Ricnik-Bay | 2008-07-11 17:53:48 | Re: function source |
Previous Message | Andrej Ricnik-Bay | 2008-07-11 16:57:01 | Re: function source |