| From: | "Wright, George" <George(dot)Wright(at)infimatic(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: function source |
| Date: | 2008-07-11 12:50:08 |
| Message-ID: | 51548D6D5BEB57468163194A8C1A0E98C6BE59@MAGPTCPEXC02.na.mag-ias.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-novice |
So does that mean there is no way to hide the source for procedural
language functions in postgresql?
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:mailing_lists(at)pandapocket(dot)com]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 12:34 PM
To: Wright, George
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [NOVICE] function source
I think that we have some functions that are defined in C. I'd have to
check the repository to get the source.
-Mark
On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 10:47 -0500, Wright, George wrote:
> Is there a way to hide/encrypt the source for functions I might write
> in any of the procedural languages?
>
>
>
> Doing \df+ <func> shows all of it.
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-07-11 14:10:16 | Re: Dataimport from remote db |
| Previous Message | Schoenit, Tobias AT/BHL-ZTPS | 2008-07-11 11:34:04 | Dataimport from remote db |