From: | "Bob Zurek" <bob(dot)zurek(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)myyearbook(dot)com>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
Date: | 2007-08-29 01:13:02 |
Message-ID: | 51494DB187D98F4C88DBEBF1F5F6D4230244F1ED@edb06.mail01.enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Nice job Gavin...
Now that I have landed at EnterpriseDB and joined the community, a
number of high level people have told me they love the Postgres naming
over PostgreSQL because they told me it is a lot easier to say and a
nice name simplification of the OSS project that is experiencing nice
growth and expansion. So I vote for Postgres.
z.
________________________________
From: pgsql-advocacy-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-advocacy-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Gavin M. Roy
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 9:04 PM
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] The naming question (Postgres vs
PostgreSQL)
I decided to do a little photoshop work in case there was enough of a
consensus at some point in the near future to get the ball rolling.
Gavin
On 8/28/07, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Decibel! wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 03:22:50PM -0400, Ron Peterson wrote:
>> 2007-08-28_10:53:41-0400 Decibel! < decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
<mailto:decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> >:
>>
>>> The google hits argument is no reason not to change the name.
>> It is. When people start searching for information using the term
>> "postgres" they will be missing out on the vast majority of available
>> information for years.
>
> Has anyone actually looked at what those 27M PostgreSQL hits are? I'm
> betting that 90% of them are duplicate copies of mailing list traffic.
> If you exclude content generated by us (which doesn't count because we
> can change the name via sed), I'm betting there's just barely 5M web
> pages about us (which would account for all the Postgres hits).
The only thing that matters is the first 10-12 hits on the first page.
Joshua D. Drake
- --
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
<http://www.commandprompt.com/>
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFG1LSkATb/zqfZUUQRAnkqAJ43dkkf1JHWBpaqFpVwau1U2bu7iwCfWclS
flhG2ylem2uWz9jTLbF5kXU=
=Ze+m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-08-29 01:28:46 | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
Previous Message | Gavin M. Roy | 2007-08-29 01:04:10 | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |