From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)krosing(dot)net> |
Cc: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Duplicate JSON Object Keys |
Date: | 2013-03-09 00:25:03 |
Message-ID: | 513A815F.8050500@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/08/2013 06:37 PM, Hannu Krosing wrote:
>
> I suspect that 99.98% of the time we will get valid and unique JS
> Object serializations or equivalent as input to json_in()
>
> If we want the getter functions to handle the "loose JSON" to Object
> conversion
> side assuming our stored JSON can contain non-unique keys then these are
> bound to be slower, as they have to do these checks. Thay can't just
> grab the first
> matching one and return or recurse on that.
No, there will be no slowdown. The parser doesn't short circuit.
Read the code.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2013-03-09 00:40:26 | Re: Enabling Checksums |
Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2013-03-08 23:37:26 | Re: Duplicate JSON Object Keys |