| From: | Guy Rouillier <guy(dot)rouillier(at)gmail(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> | 
| Cc: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Re: 9.2 timestamp function syntax error | 
| Date: | 2013-03-05 16:47:27 | 
| Message-ID: | 5136219F.8000707@gmail.com | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general | 
On 3/5/2013 9:52 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> This does not work:
>
>> test=> select timestamp(now()::timestampz);
>> ERROR:  syntax error at or near "now"
>
> timestamp(something) is a type name.  Per the comment in gram.y:
>
>   * The type names appearing here are not usable as function names
>   * because they can be followed by '(' in typename productions, which
>   * looks too much like a function call for an LR(1) parser.
In PgAdmin, here is how timestamp() is defined:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION "timestamp"(timestamp with time zone)
   RETURNS timestamp without time zone AS
'timestamptz_timestamp'
   LANGUAGE internal STABLE STRICT
   COST 1;
ALTER FUNCTION "timestamp"(timestamp with time zone)
   OWNER TO postgres;
COMMENT ON FUNCTION "timestamp"(timestamp with time zone) IS 'convert 
timestamp with time zone to timestamp';
and here is now timestamptz() is defined:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION timestamptz(timestamp without time zone)
   RETURNS timestamp with time zone AS
'timestamp_timestamptz'
   LANGUAGE internal STABLE STRICT
   COST 1;
ALTER FUNCTION timestamptz(timestamp without time zone)
   OWNER TO postgres;
COMMENT ON FUNCTION timestamptz(timestamp without time zone) IS 'convert 
timestamp to timestamp with time zone';
Ugh, I just noticed the quotation marks around the timestamp function. 
This works:
select "timestamp"(now()::timestamptz); => timestamp without time zone
This is a subtlety bound to be lost on most.  Why is there both a 
function and a type name with the same name?  I suppose I could define a 
synonym to make the function name distinct, but this seems like 
something that should be addressed.
Thanks.
-- 
Guy Rouillier
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexander Farber | 2013-03-05 16:52:58 | Re: Finding matching words in a word game | 
| Previous Message | Maciek Sakrejda | 2013-03-05 16:37:58 | Re: [HACKERS] Floating point error |