From: | Julien Cigar <jcigar(at)ulb(dot)ac(dot)be> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Optimize SELECT * from table WHERE foreign_key_id IN (key1,key2,key3,key4...) |
Date: | 2013-03-05 14:26:44 |
Message-ID: | 513600A4.7090602@ulb.ac.be |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 03/05/2013 15:00, Niels Kristian Schjødt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running a rails app, where I have a model called Car that has_many Images. Now when I tell rails to include those images, when querying say 50 cars, then it often decides to use a SELECT * from images WHERE car_id IN (id1,id2,id3,id4…) instead of doing a join.
why do you want a join here ? if you don't need any "cars" data there is
no need to JOIN that table.
Now a select ... from ... where id in (id1, id2, ..., idn) isn't very
scalable.
Instead of passing id1, id2, ..., idn you'be better pass the condition
and do a where id in (select ... ), or where exists (select 1 ... where
...), or a join, or ...
> Now either way it uses the index I have on car_id:
>
> Index Scan using car_id_ix on adverts (cost=0.47..5665.34 rows=1224 width=234)
> Index Cond: (car_id = ANY ('{7097561,7253541,5159633,6674471,...}'::integer[]))
>
> But it's slow, it's very slow. In this case it took 3,323ms
3ms isn't slow
> Can I do anything to optimize that query or maybe the index or something?
your index is already used
> The table has 16.000.000 rows
>
--
No trees were killed in the creation of this message.
However, many electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2013-03-05 16:34:04 | Re: New server setup |
Previous Message | Mark Smith | 2013-03-05 14:13:47 | Re: Poor performance after update from SLES11 SP1 to SP2 |