Re: What setup would you choose for postgresql 9.2 installation?

From: AJ Weber <aweber(at)comcast(dot)net>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What setup would you choose for postgresql 9.2 installation?
Date: 2013-03-04 14:04:48
Message-ID: 5134AA00.6080800@comcast.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Apologies for the tangential question, but how would pgpool2 "increase
throughput"? Wouldn't the same number of statements be issued by your
application? It would likely reduce the number of concurrent
connections, but that doesn't necessarily equate to "increased throughput".

-AJ

On 3/4/2013 8:52 AM, Niels Kristian Schjødt wrote:
> LSI MegaRAID SAS 9260-4i with four Intel SSDSC2CW240A3K5 SSDs OR four Hitachi Ultrastar 15K600 SAS drives?
>
> My app is pretty write heavy and I have a lot of concurrent connections 300 - (though considering adding pgpool2 in front to increase throughput).
>
> Regards Niels Kristian
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Neill 2013-03-04 14:18:00 Re: What setup would you choose for postgresql 9.2 installation?
Previous Message Niels Kristian Schjødt 2013-03-04 13:52:01 What setup would you choose for postgresql 9.2 installation?