Re: SP-GiST for ranges based on 2d-mapping and quad-tree

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
Subject: Re: SP-GiST for ranges based on 2d-mapping and quad-tree
Date: 2013-03-04 02:53:27
Message-ID: 51340CA7.3010405@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 03/04/2013 01:42 AM, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
>
> This patch only adds one more operator to already committed new
> opclass. Tests already cover this case. Without patch corresponding
> test leads to sequential scan instead of index scan. However, I can't
> see any documentation changes about already committed opclass. I think
> we need a documentation update as an separate patch.
> Jeff changes only does comments changes and renaming, I don't need to
> examine them more.

OK. Would it be fair to summarize that as "I think it's ready to commit
as-is" ? Do you have any outstanding concerns or uncertainties?

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2013-03-04 02:54:19 Re: WIP: store additional info in GIN index
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2013-03-04 02:51:06 Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables