Re: Proposed changes to security.html

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposed changes to security.html
Date: 2013-03-02 00:22:46
Message-ID: 51314656.1040106@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www


> What would be the point of that, other than introducing the use of less
> accurate language?

Oh, right, we have some contrib modules which are not extensions.
However, the term "contrib" is confusing and not very helpful. Maybe I
should use the term "Additional Supplied Modules" (shorthand "modules"),
which is what we use in the docs?

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-03-02 02:45:14 Re: msgtxt.php archive links broken
Previous Message Josh Kupershmidt 2013-03-01 23:24:36 msgtxt.php archive links broken