Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables

From: Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables
Date: 2013-02-28 17:21:58
Message-ID: 512F9236.10404@nasby.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/31/13 2:18 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> My intention was to apply a Nasby correction to Browne Strength and call
> the resulting function Browne' (Browne prime). Does that sound better?

I suggest painting that bikeshed "Browneby". :P

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2013-02-28 17:52:58 Re: Materialized views WIP patch
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-02-28 17:20:53 Re: sql_drop Event Trigger