Re: The case for version number inflation

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: The case for version number inflation
Date: 2013-02-28 17:01:19
Message-ID: 512F8D5F.5070303@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy


On 02/28/2013 08:53 AM, Dave Page wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Gavin Flower
> <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz> wrote:
>>
>> I hate the Firefox versioning system that they currently use!
>
> Yeah, I've heard loads of complaints about that.
>
>> Try educating Amazon. You _DO_ have a baseball bat?
>
> I know where you can get one...
>

To be honest, this is a non problem. As has been said a millions times
before, we will never make everyone happy. If we start inflating our
numbers, they numbers start to mean less.

Consider that Oracle, is only at 11.

Microsoft uses years to represent their product.

Informix doesn't appear to use any numbers anymore opting for Ultimate
Warehouse Edition and "Choice" edition

We aren't a marketing team. Best we can do is educate and let those who
don't bother to be educated, stay ignorant.

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC
@cmdpromptinc - 509-416-6579

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gabriele Bartolini 2013-02-28 18:04:24 Re: The case for version number inflation
Previous Message Dave Page 2013-02-28 16:53:56 Re: The case for version number inflation