From: | Jeremy Whiting <jwhiting(at)redhat(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | executeUpdate API contract. Return value equals 0. |
Date: | 2013-02-26 13:15:20 |
Message-ID: | 512CB568.70709@redhat.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Hi,
I have seen there have been conversations about the returned value from
executeUpdate when using partitioned tables. This thread places the
issue in the postgres-server court:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/013901c5fad9$1c18c600$ca78a8c0@yawin.yesasia.com
and another coversation on the pgsql-bugs mailing list that seems to
bat the problem back at the pgjdbc driver :)
I have written a test case for the driver and made it available on
GitHub. It is compatible with the current testsuit. It is there for you
to consider it's merits and use it if considered useful. I would like to
think it gives this issue visibility.
https://github.com/whitingjr/pgjdbc/tree/partitioned_table_test
Is the best way to progress this issue is to raise it again on
pgsql-bugs list ?
Regards,
Jeremy
--
Jeremy Whiting
Senior Software Engineer, Middleware Performance Team
Red Hat
------------------------------------------------------------
Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, 64 Baker Street, 4th Floor, London. W1U 7DF. United Kingdom.
Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903. Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Mark Hegarty (Ireland), Matt Parson (USA), Charlie Peters (USA)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc Fournier | 2013-02-27 00:10:17 | ENUM type via JDBC using connect string ... |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2013-02-25 04:16:10 | Re: [JDBC] can't access through SSL |