From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
Date: | 2013-02-19 22:18:24 |
Message-ID: | 5123FA30.8080006@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 02/19/2013 02:09 PM, Erik Rijkers wrote:
> On Sat, February 16, 2013 02:01, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> matview-v4.patch.gz
>
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if material views should not go into information_schema. I was thinking either
> .views or .tables. Have you considered this?
>
> I ask because as far as I can see querying for mv's has to go like this:
>
> SELECT n.nspname, c.relname
> FROM pg_catalog.pg_class c
> LEFT JOIN pg_catalog.pg_namespace n ON n.oid = c.relnamespace
> WHERE c.relkind IN ('m','')
> and n.nspname = 'myschema'
Well, I'm not sure about information_schema, but we'll definitely want a
pg_matviews system view. Also a \dM. That could wait until 9.4, though.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Fetter | 2013-02-19 22:22:26 | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
Previous Message | Erik Rijkers | 2013-02-19 22:09:13 | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Fetter | 2013-02-19 22:22:26 | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
Previous Message | Erik Rijkers | 2013-02-19 22:09:13 | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |