| From: | Daniel Wood <dwood(at)salesforce(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WITH HOLD ref cursors for plpgsql |
| Date: | 2013-02-19 20:17:37 |
| Message-ID: | 5123DDE1.4080809@salesforce.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-novice |
On 02/19/2013 01:10 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Daniel Wood <dwood(at)salesforce(dot)com> writes:
>> I believe that WITH HOLD cursors was once on a TODO list for plpgsql
>> along with scrollable cursors. When scrollable cursors was implemented,
>> but not WITH HOLD, it was dropped from the TODO list.
> Huh? It's been done for years. Unless there's some specific capability
> you find to be missing?
>
> The thread you referenced is specifically about plpgsql, not cursors
> in general.
>
> regards, tom lane
So how does one create a "WITH HOLD ref cursor for plpgsql"?
The SQL grammar for "declare" allows it but I can't find it in the
plpgsql grammar for declare.
The link I previously quoted for Pavel/Robert discussions was garbled.
It is:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/AANLkTikjVF6bENfxv-et75g-vHnRyy0y0B+og6BprhgQ@mail.gmail.com
- Dan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sergey Konoplev | 2013-02-20 05:03:55 | Re: Return table and integer value |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-02-19 09:10:52 | Re: WITH HOLD ref cursors for plpgsql |