From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com> |
Cc: | 'Phil Sorber' <phil(at)omniti(dot)com>, 'Alvaro Herrera' <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, 'Magnus Hagander' <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, 'PostgreSQL-development' <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Add PQconninfoParseParams and PQconninfodefaultsMerge to libpq |
Date: | 2013-02-18 08:11:08 |
Message-ID: | 5121E21C.3090409@vmware.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 18.02.2013 06:07, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Sunday, February 17, 2013 8:44 PM Phil Sorber wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Amit kapila<amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>>> Now the patch of Phil Sober provides 2 new API's
>> PQconninfoParseParams(), and PQconninfodefaultsMerge(),
>>> using these API's I can think of below way for patch "pass a
>> connection string to pg_basebackup, ..."
>>>
>>> 1. Call existing function PQconinfoParse() with connection string
>> input by user and get PQconninfoOption.
>>>
>>> 2. Now use the existing keywords (individual options specified by
>> user) and extract the keywords from
>>> PQconninfoOption structure and call new API
>> PQconninfoParseParams() which will return PQconninfoOption.
>>> The PQconninfoOption structure returned in this step will contain
>> all keywords
>>>
>>> 3. Call PQconninfodefaultsMerge() to merge any default values if
>> exist. Not sure if this step is required?
>>>
>>> 4. Extract individual keywords from PQconninfoOption structure and
>> call PQconnectdbParams.
>>>
>>> Is this inline with what you have in mind or you have thought of some
>> other simpler way of using new API's?
Yep, that's roughly what I had in mind. I don't think it's necessary to
merge defaults in step 3, but it needs to add the "replication=true" and
"dbname=replication" options.
>> I think what would be nice is an additional connect function that took
>> PQconninfoOption as a parameter. Or at least something that can
>> convert from PQconninfoOption to a connection string or keyword/value
>> arrays.
>
> Yes, it would be better if we would like to use new API's, I think it can
> save step-4 and some part in step-2.
pg_basebackup needs to add options to the array, so I don't think a new
connect function would help much. It's not a lot of code to iterate
through the PGconnInfoOption array and turn it back into keywords and
values arrays, so I'd just do that straight in the client code.
- Heikki
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2013-02-18 08:16:27 | Re: posix_fadvise missing in the walsender |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-02-18 04:50:09 | Re: review: ALTER ROLE ALL SET |