| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: JSON NULLs |
| Date: | 2013-02-11 23:10:50 |
| Message-ID: | 51197A7A.1010404@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 02/11/2013 03:21 AM, Yeb Havinga wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm actually wondering if we should use different operator names for
>> the get_path*op functions so we wouldn't need to type qualify the
>> path argument. Maybe ?> and ?>> although I'm reluctant to use ? in an
>> operator given the recent JDBC discussion. Or perhaps #> and #>>.
>
> different operator name: +1.
>
OK, updated patch attached. I went with #> and #>>.
cheers
andrew
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| jsonapi9.patch | text/x-patch | 139.9 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-02-11 23:27:03 | Re: palloc unification |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-02-11 21:58:14 | Re: palloc unification |