| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs |
| Date: | 2013-02-08 17:40:26 |
| Message-ID: | 5115388A.4040007@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
On 02/08/2013 07:58 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> I suggest, build it and they will come, or not. Let people push their
>> patches into Gerrit and attach the reviews to the commit fest items. If
>> reviewers then want to use that, it's their choice. We'll see how it goes.
>
> I might be misunderstanding what you're suggesting here, but it sounds
> like this would imply that reviews could end up off in a Gerrit repo
> somewhere, never getting posted to the mailing lists at all. That would
> make me sad.
It would also be ineffective. I already tried having a secondary review
forum for people who wanted to do reviews but not subscribe to -hackers;
it didn't work out too well.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Миша Тюрин | 2013-02-08 17:41:07 | pending triggers infinite list |
| Previous Message | Andreas Kretschmer | 2013-02-08 17:37:45 | Re: Bug, Feature, or what else? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2013-02-08 17:58:37 | Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs |
| Previous Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2013-02-08 16:24:53 | Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs |