Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs
Date: 2013-02-08 17:40:26
Message-ID: 5115388A.4040007@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

On 02/08/2013 07:58 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> I suggest, build it and they will come, or not. Let people push their
>> patches into Gerrit and attach the reviews to the commit fest items. If
>> reviewers then want to use that, it's their choice. We'll see how it goes.
>
> I might be misunderstanding what you're suggesting here, but it sounds
> like this would imply that reviews could end up off in a Gerrit repo
> somewhere, never getting posted to the mailing lists at all. That would
> make me sad.

It would also be ineffective. I already tried having a secondary review
forum for people who wanted to do reviews but not subscribe to -hackers;
it didn't work out too well.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Миша Тюрин 2013-02-08 17:41:07 pending triggers infinite list
Previous Message Andreas Kretschmer 2013-02-08 17:37:45 Re: Bug, Feature, or what else?

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2013-02-08 17:58:37 Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2013-02-08 16:24:53 Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs