Re: Bug, Feature, or what else?

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andreas Kretschmer <andreas(at)a-kretschmer(dot)de>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug, Feature, or what else?
Date: 2013-02-08 15:48:47
Message-ID: 51151E5F.70906@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On 02/08/2013 07:45 AM, Andreas Kretschmer wrote:
>
>>
>> If I am following the Notes section correctly in:
>>
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/interactive/sql-revoke.html
>>
>> "If a superuser chooses to issue a GRANT or REVOKE command, the command
>> is performed as though it were issued by the owner of the affected
>> object. Since all privileges ultimately come from the object owner
>> (possibly indirectly via chains of grant options), it is possible for a
>> superuser to revoke all privileges, but this might require use of
>> CASCADE as stated above."
>>
>>
>> Try:
>>
>> revoke all on schema public from ak02 cascade;
>
> Yeah, i read that before, but doesn't help:
>
>
>
> db115150=# revoke all on schema public from ak02 cascade;
> REVOKE
> db115150=# drop user ak02;
> FEHLER: kann Rolle »ak02« nicht löschen, weil andere Objekte davon abhängen
> DETAIL: Privilegien für Schema public
>
>
> Strange, isn't it?

Well I got left is:

REVOKE PUBLIC FROM ak02;

>
>
> Andreas
>
>

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc Brazeau 2013-02-08 15:51:39 Re: pl/java for postgresql 9.2
Previous Message Andreas Kretschmer 2013-02-08 15:45:34 Re: Bug, Feature, or what else?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-02-08 15:55:03 Re: Vacuum/visibility is busted
Previous Message Andreas Kretschmer 2013-02-08 15:45:34 Re: Bug, Feature, or what else?