| From: | Marko Tiikkaja <pgmail(at)joh(dot)to> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs |
| Date: | 2013-02-06 21:41:41 |
| Message-ID: | 5112CE15.4060909@joh.to |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
On 06/02/2013 22:25, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Mind you, when I explained our current CF review workflow for the SF
> ReviewFest last year, the attendees thought I was insane. It's kept me
> from doing more reviewfests. Our current workflow and tooling is
> definitely a serious obstacle to gettng more reviewers. Seems like a
> good topic for the developer meeting.
I'm honestly having a hard time believing this. I've never thought of
the commitfest workflow as complicated or burdensome. I actually quite
like how things are there at the moment.
Besides, if we can't expect people to spend 30 minutes figuring out the
workflow, how on earth do we expect them to review patches?
Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-02-06 21:53:26 | Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2013-02-06 21:25:31 | Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-02-06 21:53:26 | Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-02-06 21:41:28 | Re: Proposed changes to security.html |