From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Training approval policy on pg.org |
Date: | 2013-02-06 19:29:18 |
Message-ID: | 5112AF0E.2090708@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On 01/31/2013 08:03 AM, Dave Page wrote:
> Following a quick discussion with Magnus, I've approved all the rest.
> It's clear that the vast majority of folks here support allowing much
> more training than we currently do, and as it stands, the policy
> actually says the moderators may reject more than 4 posts per quarter
> at their discretion, i.e. accept by default.
Well, more training than we currently do *except for one training
provider*. I was just checking, and that provider is still posting.
I'd like, as a moderator, to stick to the policy that we reject more
than 4 posts per quarter from CertFirst due to the simple reason that,
as reported, they cancel/reschedule a high proportion of their trainings.
For that matter, if we received a similar report about any other
training provider, I think we should follow the same policy. Works for
everybody?
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2013-02-06 19:30:56 | Re: Training approval policy on pg.org |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2013-02-06 08:29:13 | Re: commitfest.postgresql.org raw data |