Re: [BUGS]log can not be output when use DataSource

danap,

> 5. getURL() - Changed from private to public, Why?, DriverManager Contains
> no such public method nor Does the Java API define for interface
> DataSource,
> OK???

The changing is just for testing.
It is also useful to compare two DataSource(for instance one is a copy of another )
But if just for testing,now i have an another idea,
implementing toString() method which just call getURL().
What about that?

> 6. user & password - Even if 5. approved public why would these be open to
> a public interface for returning these values with URL. In a basic
> instinct I feel this is security risk.
> NOT OK

oh,they are not needed just as you said.
Sorry,i failed to understood your reply.
> in getURL(). The properties user & password are included in getConnection()
> and therefore do not not need to be in getURL().

Chen Huajun
(2013/02/04 4:44), dmp wrote:
> Review for patch:
>
> org/postgresql/ds/common/BaseDataSource:
>
> 1. databaseName - Was null possibly so getURL(), getReference(), &
> writeBaseObject() checked,
> OK
>
> 2. binaryTransferEnable/Disable - Same as databaseName for writeBaseObject(),
> OK
>
> 3. logLevelSet - Needed to Address Bug this patch applies to directly,
> OK
>
> 4. receiveBufferSize & sendBufferSize - Addresses lack of getter Methods,
> OK
>
> 5. getURL() - Changed from private to public, Why?, DriverManager Contains
> no such public method nor Does the Java API define for interface
> DataSource,
> OK???
>
> 6. user & password - Even if 5. approved public why would these be open to
> a public interface for returning these values with URL. In a basic
> instinct I feel this is security risk.
> NOT OK
>
> 7. sslFactory - Proper check for null in getReference(),
> OK
>
> 8. applicationName - Proper check for null in getReference(),
> OK
>
> org/postgresql/test/jdbc2/optional/BaseDataSourceTest:
>
> 1. I'm not proficient with JUnit, but appears to add testing for getURL()
> in 5. above. If that is not approved then test suite addition is
> not needed.
> OK?
>
> danap
>
> Chen Huajun wrote:
>> danap,
>>
>> Please use the new patch.
>> I add a test case,and fixed a mistake in the old one.
>>
>> Chen Huajun
>> (2013/02/03 10:32), dmp wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I can review this tomorrow and get back by Monday, or sooner.
>>>
>>> danap.
>>>
>>> Chen Huajun wrote:
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> I have made a new patch for BaseDataSource ,please check it.
>>>> Some modifications in getReference() is just for keeping
>>>> the same style to other String parameters .
>>>>
>>>> Chen Huajun
>
>