From: | Maciej Łopuszański <lopuszanski(at)oleofarm(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #7842: pg_dump scripts view to table |
Date: | 2013-02-01 11:27:17 |
Message-ID: | 510BA695.3060408@oleofarm.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
is there a way to find exactly what object/table/column creates this
circular dependency?
pg_dumb even in verbose mode does not warn/error of this situation. I
managed to find this by testing copy of production db(this should be
reported by pg_dump). also there is nothing fancy about this 'view' of mine.
in db it looks like this:
t1, t2, t3.......t10
create view1 from t1-t10
create view2 from view1 (only agregation with group by).
pg_dump creates table from view1.
best regards,
maciej lopuszanski
W dniu 31.01.2013 20:27, Tom Lane pisze:
> lopuszanski(at)oleofarm(dot)com writes:
>> 1. after using pg_dump to dump WHOLE database to file, 1 of views 'turned'
>> into a table.
>> so there is no 'create or replace VIEW XXXX .......' with definition, but
>> instead:
>> its scripted as 'create TABLE XXXX......' and definition.(in file that
>> pg_dump created)
> There's probably a CREATE RULE command further down that turns it into a
> view again.
>
>> 2. but after using pg_dump to dump only this 1 problematic 'view' (with -t
>> option) it stores it correcly as 'create or replace VIEW XXXX .......'
> That's not terribly surprising. The separate table and rule entries
> would only be used when it's necessary to work around a circular
> dependency with some other object.
>
>> it looks like pg_dump has problem with dependancies of this view.....
> I see no reason to think there's a bug here. If you still think it's
> a bug, you need to provide enough information for someone else to
> reproduce the case.
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/bug-reporting.html
>
> regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | info | 2013-02-01 12:02:41 | BUG #7844: xpath missing entity decoding - bug or feature |
Previous Message | QuiverNAY | 2013-02-01 11:03:32 | BUG #7843: Incorrect using icacls |