Re: pg_dump --pretty-print-views

From: Marko Tiikkaja <pgmail(at)joh(dot)to>
To: Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump --pretty-print-views
Date: 2013-01-30 09:29:10
Message-ID: 5108E7E6.3030903@joh.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/30/13 7:52 AM, Jeevan Chalke wrote:
> Looks good this time.
>
> Will mark "Ready for committor"

Thanks for reviewing it more carefully than I did! :-) And my apologies
for the confusion earlier.

> However, I am not sure about putting "WRAP_COLUMN_DEFAULT" by default. In
> my opinion we should put that by default but other people may object so I
> will keep that in code committors plate.

I have no opinion on this to one way or the other, so I'm fine with
waiting for someone else (possibly the committer) to decide this.

Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2013-01-30 09:48:40 Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables
Previous Message Jeevan Chalke 2013-01-30 06:52:33 Re: pg_dump --pretty-print-views