From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | "'Alexander Korotkov'" <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "'pgsql-hackers'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Patch for removng unused targets |
Date: | 2013-01-22 06:32:31 |
Message-ID: | 50FE327F.4030600@2ndQuadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/22/2013 01:24 PM, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>
> I'd like to rework on this optimization and submit a patch at the next
> CF. Is that okay?
>
That sounds very sensible to me, given how busy CF2013-01 is and the
remaining time before 9.3.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter van Hardenberg | 2013-01-22 06:45:45 | Re: Prepared statements fail after schema changes with surprising error |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2013-01-22 06:31:14 | Re: Review of "pg_basebackup and pg_receivexlog to use non-blocking socket communication", was: Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #7534: walreceiver takes long time to detect n/w breakdown |