| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution) |
| Date: | 2013-01-21 18:54:33 |
| Message-ID: | 50FD8EE9.3090106@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> IMHO that's the single most important task of a review.
Really? I'd say the most important task for a review is "does the patch
do what it says it does?". That is, if the patch is supposed to
implement feature X, does it actually? If it's a performance patch,
does performance actually improve?
If the patch doesn't implement what it's supposed to, who cares what the
code looks like?
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-01-21 19:04:14 | Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution) |
| Previous Message | Phil Sorber | 2013-01-21 18:45:55 | [PATCH] PQping Docs |