| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution) |
| Date: | 2013-01-21 03:04:22 |
| Message-ID: | 50FCB036.6060903@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/20/2013 09:37 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> As a junior reviewer, I'd like to know if my main task should be to decide
>> between 1) writing a review convincing you or Tom that your judgement is
>> hasty, or 2) to convince the author that your judgement is correct.
> That's a hard question.
I don't think so. IMNSHO your job is neither - it is to give us your
independent judgment.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2013-01-21 03:07:07 | Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-01-21 03:01:44 | Re: proposal: fix corner use case of variadic fuctions usage |