| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Contrib PROGRAM problem |
| Date: | 2013-01-19 04:57:47 |
| Message-ID: | 50FA27CB.9090005@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/18/2013 11:42 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> This patch seems to do the right thing.
> Hmm ... seems kinda grotty ... isn't there a cleaner way?
>
>> It probably needs to be applied to all the live branches.
> Agreed on back-patching once we have the right thing, but I don't like
> this version too much.
>
>
I'm happy of you can find something cleaner.
We can't just have a dependency of all on $(PROGRAM)($X) because if
PROGRAM is empty but X is not it will do something horrid like try to
build ".exe".
If we do it the way Zoltan suggested then on Windows even if
$(PROGRAM)$(X) exists and is up to date it could be rebuilt, since the
target name won't exist.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-01-19 04:59:48 | Re: Contrib PROGRAM problem |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-01-19 04:42:17 | Re: Contrib PROGRAM problem |