From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] COPY .. COMPRESSED |
Date: | 2013-01-15 23:33:19 |
Message-ID: | 50F5E73F.5090808@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/15/2013 06:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
>> Perhaps I'm taking a bit too narrow view of the world, but my thinking
>> is OLTP won't want things compressed, as it increases latency of
>> requests, while OLAP users are operating with enough data that they'll
>> go through the effort to use COPY.
> Also, if there are so many people using COPY in their apps, why have we
> never seen any submitted patches to extend libpq with functions to
> construct/deconstruct COPY data? Surely somebody would have said to
> themselves that they shouldn't be responsible for knowing those escaping
> rules.
There are perfectly good libraries in Perl and other languages for
constructing/deconstructing CSV data. If we didn't have CSV
import/export I suspect we would have heard lots more howls by now.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2013-01-15 23:48:16 | Re: pg_ctl idempotent option |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2013-01-15 23:26:01 | Re: Curious buildfarm failures (fwd) |