| From: | Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com |
| Cc: | AJ Weber <aweber(at)comcast(dot)net>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Two Necessary Kernel Tweaks for Linux Systems |
| Date: | 2013-01-14 14:28:48 |
| Message-ID: | 50F41620.4000803@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
2013-01-08 22:48 keltezéssel, Shaun Thomas írta:
> On 01/08/2013 02:05 PM, AJ Weber wrote:
>
>> Is there an "easy" way to tell what scheduler my OS is using?
>
> Unfortunately not. I looked again, and it seems that CFS was merged into 2.6.23.
> Anything before that is probably safe, but the vendor may have backported it. If you
> don't see the settings I described, you probably don't have it.
>
> So I guess Midge had 2.6.18, which predates the merge in 2.6.23.
>
> I honestly don't understand the Linux kernel sometimes. A process scheduler swap is a
> *gigantic* functional change, and it's in a dot release. I vastly prefer PostgreSQL's
> approach...
The kernel version numbering is different.
A point release in 2.6.x is 2.6.x.y.
This has changed in 3.x, a point release is 3.x.y.
Best regards,
Zoltán Böszörményi
--
----------------------------------
Zoltán Böszörményi
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de
http://www.postgresql.at/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2013-01-14 16:45:01 | Re: [PERFORM] Slow query: bitmap scan troubles |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2013-01-14 11:34:12 | Re: serious under-estimation of n_distinct for clustered distributions |