On 2013-01-13 19:20, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> On 2013-01-13 18:10, Hal Hildebrand wrote:
>> Is the break out of the maven modules acceptable?
>
> Yes, although I'd prefer if the module named 'jdbc' was named 'plugin'
> or 'module'
On second thought, 'plugin' is a bad name. We might want to create a
maven plug-in for pljava at some point. What about 'server' to signify
that this is the part that runs in the server?
- thomas
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pgfoundry.org/pipermail/pljava-dev/attachments/20130113/949ba8ec/attachment.html>