From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | emilu(at)encs(dot)concordia(dot)ca, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: JDBC to load UTF8@psql to latin1@mysql |
Date: | 2012-12-14 15:44:29 |
Message-ID: | 50CB495D.3080208@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 12/14/2012 07:35 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Meh. That character renders as \310 in your mail, which is not an
>> assigned code in ISO 8859-1. The numerically corresponding Unicode
>> value would be U+0090, which is an unspecified control character.
>
> Oh, scratch that, apparently I can't do hex/octal arithmetic in my
> head first thing in the morning. It's really U+00C8 which is perfectly
> valid. I can't see a reason why that character and only that character
> would be problematic --- have you done systematic testing to confirm
> that that's the only should-be-LATIN1 character that fails?
This is where I am confused, in one of the original posts the OP said:
"JAVA codes work for most of characters, but not "-È"."
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-12-14 15:45:13 | Re: Problem starting PG-9.2 on non-default port |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2012-12-14 15:43:41 | Re: Implicit casts to array types |