Re: JDBC to load UTF8@psql to latin1@mysql

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: emilu(at)encs(dot)concordia(dot)ca, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: JDBC to load UTF8@psql to latin1@mysql
Date: 2012-12-14 15:44:29
Message-ID: 50CB495D.3080208@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 12/14/2012 07:35 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Meh. That character renders as \310 in your mail, which is not an
>> assigned code in ISO 8859-1. The numerically corresponding Unicode
>> value would be U+0090, which is an unspecified control character.
>
> Oh, scratch that, apparently I can't do hex/octal arithmetic in my
> head first thing in the morning. It's really U+00C8 which is perfectly
> valid. I can't see a reason why that character and only that character
> would be problematic --- have you done systematic testing to confirm
> that that's the only should-be-LATIN1 character that fails?

This is where I am confused, in one of the original posts the OP said:

"JAVA codes work for most of characters, but not "-È"."

>
> regards, tom lane
>
>

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-12-14 15:45:13 Re: Problem starting PG-9.2 on non-default port
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2012-12-14 15:43:41 Re: Implicit casts to array types