From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | tim_wilson <tim(dot)wilson(at)telogis(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Statistics mismatch between n_live_tup and actual row count |
Date: | 2012-12-07 02:26:21 |
Message-ID: | 50C153CD.4010304@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 12/06/2012 06:13 PM, tim_wilson wrote:
> This drift gets more confusing.
>
> My small table A (60K rows) is not being inserted to (except one or two
> rows) it is getting thousands of updates a minute. Analyze and vacuum on the
> table are running regularly. But sometimes ,every time the vacuum runs the
> reltuples value jumps up. Sometime bloating by 4 times the actualy size of
> the table (have seen 10 times)
>
> The impact of this on the query plans is evident straight away. Joins from
> all small A to large table B (55 Million rows) on the large B's primary key
> start seq scanning.
>
> Some sort of threshold is being hit where the planner believes that the size
> of A is big enough that given we are requesting all of A we might as well
> scan all of B.
>
> Also even though the table has been clustered and even vacuum full'ed the
> relpages value continues to grow.
>
> Any answers?
1) FYI an update is a delete/insert, so you are actually getting
thousands of inserts a minute.
2) As to why the size is growing- Are there open transactions holding
old row versions around?
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | tim_wilson | 2012-12-07 02:45:03 | Re: Statistics mismatch between n_live_tup and actual row count |
Previous Message | tim_wilson | 2012-12-07 02:13:54 | Re: Statistics mismatch between n_live_tup and actual row count |