| From: | Shaun Thomas <sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Ubuntu 12.04 / 3.2 Kernel Bad for PostgreSQL Performance |
| Date: | 2012-12-05 22:25:28 |
| Message-ID: | 50BFC9D8.4010507@optionshouse.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 12/05/2012 04:19 PM, Daniel Farina wrote:
> Is 3.2 a significant regression from previous releases, or is 3.4 just
> faster? Your wording only indicates that "older kernel is slow," but
> your tone would suggest that you feel this is a regression, cf.
It's definitely a regression. I'm trying to pin it down, but the
3.2.0-24 kernel didn't do the CPU drain down to single-digits on that
client load test. I'm working on 3.2.0-30 and going down to figure out
which patch might have done it.
Older kernels performed better. And by older, I mean 2.6. Still not 3.4
levels, but that's expected. I haven't checked 3.0, but other threads
I've read suggest it had less problems. Sorry if I wasn't clear.
--
Shaun Thomas
OptionsHouse | 141 W. Jackson Blvd. | Suite 500 | Chicago IL, 60604
312-444-8534
sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com
______________________________________________
See http://www.peak6.com/email_disclaimer/ for terms and conditions related to this email
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-12-05 22:41:48 | Re: Ubuntu 12.04 / 3.2 Kernel Bad for PostgreSQL Performance |
| Previous Message | Daniel Farina | 2012-12-05 22:19:41 | Re: Ubuntu 12.04 / 3.2 Kernel Bad for PostgreSQL Performance |