From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
---|---|
To: | Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com>, Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Avoid incomplete copy string (src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c) |
Date: | 2024-07-01 08:52:22 |
Message-ID: | 50BF501F-58BA-450B-A1FA-B083D8EFCEE1@yesql.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 27 Jun 2024, at 06:01, Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> Em dom., 23 de jun. de 2024 às 23:56, Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> escreveu:
>>> On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 7:51 AM Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> memcpy with strlen does not copy the whole string.
>>>> strlen returns the exact length of the string, without
>>>> the null-termination.
>>>
>>> I noticed that the two callers of do_pg_backup_start both allocate
>>> BackupState with palloc0. Can we rely on this to ensure that the
>>> BackupState.name is initialized with null-termination?
>>>
>> I do not think so.
In this case we can, we do that today..
> However, I wonder it is better to use strlcpy without assuming such the good
> manner of callers.
..that being said I agree that it seems safer to use strlcpy() here.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Rowley | 2024-07-01 08:55:44 | Make tuple deformation faster |
Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2024-07-01 08:45:53 | Re: Is missing LOGIN Event on Trigger Firing Matrix ? |