From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: --single-transaction hack to pg_upgrade does not work |
Date: | 2012-12-01 12:43:17 |
Message-ID: | 50B9FB65.5090601@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/30/2012 11:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Some of the buildfarm members are failing the pg_upgrade regression test
> since commit 12ee6ec71f8754ff3573711032b9b4d5a764ba84. I can duplicate
> it here, and the symptom is:
>
> pg_restore: creating TYPE float8range
> pg_restore: creating TYPE insenum
> pg_restore: [archiver (db)] Error while PROCESSING TOC:
> pg_restore: [archiver (db)] Error from TOC entry 978; 1247 16584 TYPE insenum tgl
> pg_restore: [archiver (db)] could not execute query: ERROR: ALTER TYPE ... ADD cannot run inside a transaction block
> Command was:
> -- For binary upgrade, must preserve pg_type oid
> SELECT binary_upgrade.set_next_pg_type_oid('16584'::pg_catalog.oid);
>
> I have not investigated why it apparently passes some places; this looks
> to me like a guaranteed failure.
>
>
Testing pg_upgrade has only been in buildfarm releases since September
28, and even then is optional, although enabled by default in the sample
config file. Looks like even I need to upgrade a few of my animals to do
it. It probably needs to improve its error logging though.
Seems odd not to have run "make check" before committing, though.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2012-12-01 13:45:20 | Tablespaces in the data directory |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2012-12-01 12:14:08 | Re: proposal: fix corner use case of variadic fuctions usage |