Re: Review: Extra Daemons / bgworker

From: Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Review: Extra Daemons / bgworker
Date: 2012-11-30 13:55:48
Message-ID: 50B8BAE4.3030001@bluegap.ch
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro,

On 11/30/2012 02:44 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> So it
> makes easier to have processes that need to run alongside postmaster.

That's where we are in respectful disagreement, then. As I don't think
that's easier, overall, but in my eye, this looks like a foot gun.

As long as things like pgbouncer, pgqd, etc.. keep to be available as
separate daemons, I'm happy, though.

Regards

Markus Wanner

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kohei KaiGai 2012-11-30 14:16:26 Re: Review: Extra Daemons / bgworker
Previous Message Kohei KaiGai 2012-11-30 13:55:33 Re: Review: Extra Daemons / bgworker