From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pg Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2 |
Date: | 2012-11-28 13:15:56 |
Message-ID: | 50B60E8C.7060602@vmware.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On 28.11.2012 06:27, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:08:12AM -0800, Jeff Janes wrote:
>> Doing PITR in 9.2.1, the system claims that it reached a consistent
>> recovery state immediately after redo starts.
>> This leads to it various mysterious failures, when it should instead
>> throw a "requested recovery stop point is before consistent recovery
>> point" error.
>> (If you are unlucky, I think it might even silently start up in a
>> corrupt state.)
>
> I observed a similar problem with 9.2. Despite a restore_command that failed
> every time, startup from a hot backup completed. At the time, I suspected a
> mistake on my part.
I believe this was caused by this little typo/thinko:
> --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
> +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
> @@ -6763,7 +6763,7 @@ StartupXLOG(void)
> /* Pop the error context stack */
> error_context_stack = errcontext.previous;
>
> - if (!XLogRecPtrIsInvalid(ControlFile->backupStartPoint) &&
> + if (!XLogRecPtrIsInvalid(ControlFile->backupEndPoint) &&
> XLByteLE(ControlFile->backupEndPoint, EndRecPtr))
> {
> /*
Normally, backupEndPoint is invalid, and we rely on seeing an
end-of-backup WAL record to mark the location. backupEndPoint is only
set when restoring from a backup that was taken from a standby, but
thanks to the above, recovery incorrectly treats that as end-of-backup.
Fixed, thanks for the report!
- Heikki
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2012-11-28 13:26:50 | Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2 |
Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2012-11-28 04:27:28 | Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2012-11-28 13:26:50 | Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2 |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2012-11-28 12:59:06 | Re: Bugs in CREATE/DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY |