From: | "Will Rutherdale (rutherw)" <rutherw(at)cisco(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Is there a meaningful benchmark? |
Date: | 2009-03-20 18:15:22 |
Message-ID: | 50A8E1F8D9122546A7F67134915EDB7A3B8E3A@xmb-rtp-21a.amer.cisco.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Point taken.
Thank you for the help.
-Will
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
Sent: 20 March 2009 12:06
To: Will Rutherdale (rutherw)
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Is there a meaningful benchmark?
"Will Rutherdale (rutherw)" <rutherw(at)cisco(dot)com> writes:
> However, keeping the KISS principle in mind, you can create a
benchmark
> that simply sets up a sample database and forks off a bunch of
processes
> to do random updates for an hour, say. Dead simple.
Indeed, and more than likely dead useless. The only benchmark that
really counts is one's live application, which is probably not
update-only and probably has a fairly non-random update pattern too.
What people have been trying to point out to you is that you can
certainly measure *something* with a benchmark test that has no thought
behind it, but it's not clear whether the numbers you come up with will
have any real-world value.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Will Rutherdale (rutherw) | 2009-03-20 18:16:32 | Re: Is there a meaningful benchmark? |
Previous Message | Ben Ali Rachid | 2009-03-20 17:56:02 | Re: Srf function : missing library on PostgreSQL 8.3.6 on Windows? |