| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Craig Ringer <ringerc(at)ringerc(dot)id(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: WIP patch: add (PRE|POST)PROCESSOR options to COPY |
| Date: | 2012-11-14 20:15:38 |
| Message-ID: | 50A3FBEA.7010506@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/14/2012 02:37 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> What I'm imagining is a very very simple addition to COPY that just
> allows it to execute popen() instead of fopen() to read or write the
> data source/sink. What you suggest would require hundreds of lines and
> create many opportunities for new bugs.
>
>
That's certainly a better answer than any I've had. I accept the reasoning.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2012-11-14 20:21:29 | Re: Enabling Checksums |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-11-14 20:06:00 | Re: Enabling Checksums |