From: | David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: HT on or off for E5-26xx ? |
Date: | 2012-11-08 14:18:47 |
Message-ID: | 509BBF47.7090905@boreham.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 11/8/2012 6:58 AM, Shaun Thomas wrote:
> On 11/07/2012 09:16 PM, David Boreham wrote:
>
>> bash-4.1$ /usr/pgsql-9.2/bin/pgbench -T 600 -j 48 -c 48
>
> Unfortunately without -S, you're not really testing the processors. A
> regular pgbench can fluctuate a more than that due to writing and
> checkpoints.
Hmm...my goal was to test with a workload close to our application's
(which is heavy OLTP, small transactions and hence sensitive to I/O
commit rate).
The hypothesis I was testing was that enabling HT positively degrades
performance (which in my case it does not). I wasn't to be honest really
testing the additional benefit from HT, rather observing that it is
non-negative :)
If I have time I can run the select-only test for you and post the
results. The DB fits into memory so it will be a good CPU test.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas | 2012-11-08 15:30:39 | Re: Query completed in < 1s in PG 9.1 and ~ 700s in PG 9.2 |
Previous Message | Shaun Thomas | 2012-11-08 13:58:31 | Re: HT on or off for E5-26xx ? |